|
|
|
Understanding Market
Alternatives |
|
|
Why do I need to understand market
alternatives?
The
objective in understanding and analyzing marketing alternatives is to find
the alternative with the highest net return, the
capacity to
reduce income variability, and an
acceptable level of risk.
Alternative methods are formed through
combinations of when and how you market
-
When – planting, pre-harvest, harvest,
or post-harvest
-
How – cash sale, deferred pricing,
forward contract, basis contract, hedging with futures or options
Marketing methods discussed in this
section:
Each section will discuss advantages and
disadvantages of the marketing method, give insight as to when the method is
most effective, offer real-life scenarios and give you the opportunity to
personalize the method with your own farm example.
|
|
|
CASH SALE AT HARVEST
Grain is delivered and sold for cash at harvest
in convenient market.Advantages
- No costs or inconvenience of storage
- No accumulating interest costs
- Easily understood
- Price is known immediately
- No shrink or deterioration
Disadvantages
- Shortens marketing window
- Harvest price is often lowest
- Eliminates other cash-based alternatives
- Congestion at elevators
When to Use
- When prices are favorable and at levels
anticipated in the marketing plan
|
SCENARIO 1:
Harvest 30,000 bu of SWW and deliver to
local elevator. Settle immediately (August 10) at posted price of $3.35/bu
(after any applicable discounts). Settlement was $100,500.
|
ACTION
POINT
When and how would you use this on your
farm?
back>>
|
|
|
STORE FOR LATER SALE
Grain is placed in on-farm or commercial storage
and sold at a later time determined by the grower.
Advantages
- Extends pricing decision window
- Increases flexibility with on-farm storage
or increases delivery convenience with commercial storage
- Return on storage if price rises
Disadvantages
- Quality may deteriorate
- Decreased delivery flexibility if stored
commercially
- Increased storage and interest costs
- Risk of adverse price change during
storage
When to Use
- When prices are below the level
anticipated in the marketing plan, assuming the producer has adequate
financial resources
- When there is a realistic expectation of a
market price increase
|
SCENARIO 1:
Harvest 30,000 bu SWW and deliver to local
elevator for later sale (agreed to sell on Oct. 15). Posted price at
harvest (Aug 10) was $3.35/bu. Storage cost $.025/bu/month, with 20 day free
storage). Price on October 15 was $3.50/bu. Settlement was $103,500
($105,000 minus storage costs).
|
ACTION
POINT
When and how would you use this on your
farm?
back>>
|
|
|
DELAYED PRICING CONTRACT
|
|
Grain is delivered to a commercial elevator and title passes to the elevator
but the price is to be determined in the future. Price is tied to
local posted bid or a terminal market bid. Another option is delayed
payment, where price is set at delivery but payment is taken at later date.
Advantages
- Extends pricing decision window
- Gain when prices rise
- May eliminate or reduce commercial storage
fees (title usually passes to elevator upon delivery)
- Possible advance payment
- Convenient contract quantities
Disadvantages
- Interest costs and storage fees
- Unsecured creditor in bankruptcy
- Rise of adverse price or basis change
until grain is priced
- Potential repayment of part of the advance
if price drops
When to Use
- When storage is tight
- When unsatisfied with current prices and
local elevator wants to move more grain into the marketing channel
|
SCENARIO 1:
Harvest 30,000 bu SWW and deliver to local elevator for later pricing
(agreed to price in mid April when wheat prices show seasonal strength).
Posted price at harvest (Aug 10) was $3.35/bu. Price on April 15 was $3.92/bu.
Settlement was $117,600.
|
ACTION
POINT When and how would you use
this on your farm?
back>>
|
|
|
FORWARD CONTRACT
Grower agrees to deliver a specified quantity
and quality of grain to the buyer, at a designated place and date, and at a
pre-determined prcie.
Advantages
- Contract quantity can be small allowing
for 'spreading' sales throughout the season.
- Easy to initiate and little or no costs to
sign a contract
- Eliminates risk of adverse price or basis
change
- Extends pricing decision window
Disadvantages
- Guarantees a fixed price, no gain if price
raises or basis strengthens
- Increases production risk as delivery is
an obligation
- Reduces flexibility when market conditions
change
When to Use
- To schedule deliveries that better fit
with labor, grain quality and logistics
- When crops are large or storage is tight
- When the market price reaches the
objective in the marketing plan
- If price and basis are both considered
acceptable.
|
SCENARIO 1: Contract
to deliver 30,000 bu of SWW to
local elevator for established price of $3.50/bu. Settle immediately upon
delivery (August 10) at net price of $3.45/bu (contract $3.50 minus quality
discounts). Settlement was $103,500.
|
ACTION
POINT When and how would you use
this on your farm?
back>>
|
|
|
HEDGING WITH FUTURES
|
|
Using a futures contract as a temporary
substitute for an intended transaction in the cash market that will occur at
a later date. Advantages
- Extends pricing decision window
- Risk of adverse price change is eliminated
- Easy to reverse position
- Basis is more predictable than price
Disadvantages
- Risk of adverse basis change
- Margin requirements increase interest
costs and may cause cash flow problems
- Contracts only offered in fixed increments
- Requires knowledge of futures and basis
- Eliminates gain from rising cash price
When to Use
- To protect the value of grain in inventory
or the value of expected production
- To help reduce downside price risk
- When price is acceptable and basis is
unacceptable??? And hope basis improves
|
SCENARIO 1:
Date: Mid January
Expected production: 30,000 bu of wheat in
August
Sell date: Approximately 15-Aug
Appropriate futures contract month is Sep
Evaluate expected hedge price using CBOT Sep
futures contract:
Sep futures price = $3.35/bu
+ expected local basis = ($.10)
- cost of hedging = $.02
= expected hedge price = $3.23 cents
Compare hedge to other alternatives
-
Cash forward contract
-
Price with options
-
Don't Price
Decision price with hedge:
-
Quantity to hedge: 67% of production (~20,000
bu)
-
Number of contracts: four (20,000/5,000)
-
Sell four Sep contracts at $3.35
-
Expected hedge price = $3.23/bu
|
|
Situation A - Aug 15
Market Activity: Local price increases to $3.50/bu
Basis holds at ($.10)
|
Jan 15
Sep futures price $3.35 bu.
Local basis ($.10) |
Aug 15
Local cash price $3.50 bu.
Local basis ($.10)
Sep future price $3.60 bu.
|
|
Date |
Cash Market |
Futures Market |
Basis |
|
Jan 15 |
|
Sell 20,000 bu Sep04
futures @ $3.35 |
($.10) |
| August 15 |
Sell wheat @
$3.50 |
Buy 20,000 bu Sep04
futures @ $3.60 |
($.10) |
|
Grain/Loss |
|
($.25) |
unchanged |
| |
|
|
|
| Cash price
(wheat, Aug 15) |
$3.50 |
| Loss on
futures contract |
($.25) |
|
Cost of hedge |
($.02) |
|
Realized Price |
$3.23/bu |
|
|
|
|
| *Basis
held - you get net expected hedge price. |
| |
|
Situation B - Aug 15
Market Activity: Local price decreases to $2.60/bu
Basis holds at ($.10)
|
Jan 15
Sep futures price $3.35 bu.
Local basis ($.10) |
Aug 15
Local cash price $2.60 bu.
Local basis ($.10)
Sep future price $2.70 bu.
|
|
Date |
Cash Market |
Futures Market |
Basis |
|
Jan 15 |
|
Sell 20,000 bu Sep04
futures @ $3.35 |
($.10) |
|
August 15 |
Sell wheat @ $2.60 |
Buy 20,000 bu Sep04
futures @ $2.70 |
($.10) |
|
Grain/Loss |
|
$.65 |
unchanged |
| |
|
|
|
| Cash price
(wheat, Aug 15) |
$2.60 |
| Loss on
futures contract |
$.65 |
|
Cost of hedge |
($.02) |
|
Realized Price |
$3.23/bu |
|
|
|
|
| *Basis
held - you get net expected hedge price. |
| |
|
Situation C - Aug 15
Market Activity: Local price decreases to $2.60/bu
Basis weakens to ($.20)
|
Jan 15
Sep futures price $3.35 bu.
Local basis ($.10) |
Aug 15
Local cash price $2.60 bu.
Local basis ($.20)
Sep future price $2.80 bu.
|
|
Date |
Cash Market |
Futures Market |
Basis |
|
Jan 15 |
|
Sell 20,000 bu Sep04
futures @ $3.35 |
($.10) |
|
August 15 |
Sell wheat @ $2.60 |
Buy 20,000 bu Sep04
futures @ $2.80 |
($.20) |
|
Grain/Loss |
|
$.55 |
-$.10 |
| |
|
|
|
| Cash price
(wheat, Aug 15) |
$2.60 |
| Loss on
futures contract |
$.55 |
|
Cost of hedge |
($.02) |
|
Realized Price |
$3.13/bu |
|
|
|
| *Basis
weakens - reduces net hedge selling price by basis change. |
| |
|
Situation D - Aug 15
Market Activity: Local price decreases to $3.50/bu
Basis strengthens to ($.00)
|
Jan 15
Sep futures price $3.35 bu.
Local basis ($.10) |
Aug 15
Local cash price $3.50 bu.
Local basis ($.00)
Sep future price $3.50 bu.
|
|
Date |
Cash Market |
Futures Market |
Basis |
|
Jan 15 |
|
Sell 20,000 bu Sep04
futures @ $3.35 |
($.10) |
|
August 15 |
Sell wheat @ $3.50 |
Buy 20,000 bu Sep04
futures @ $3.50 |
($.00) |
|
Grain/Loss |
|
$.15 |
+$.10 |
| |
|
|
|
| Cash price
(wheat, Aug 15) |
$3.50 |
| Loss on
futures contract |
$.15 |
|
Cost of hedge |
($.02) |
|
Realized Price |
$3.33/bu |
|
|
|
| *Basis
strengthens - increases net hedge selling price by basis change. |
| |
ACTION
POINT When and how would you use
this on your farm?
back>>
|
|
|
BASIS CONTRACT
Grain is delivered to a commercial elevator and
sold prior to a designated date at a specified amount about or below a
futures price (or basis).
Advantages
- Extends pricing decision window
- May reduce commercial storage costs
- No risk of adverse basis change
- Convenient contract quantities
- Possible advance partial payment
Disadvantages
- Unsecured creditor in bankruptcy
- Risk of adverse price change until grain
is priced
- Potential repayment of advance
- Basis knowledge is required
When to Use
- When basis is strong (cash prices are high
relative to futures) and there is some potential for an increase in
futures prices
- When basis offer is acceptable but price
is unacceptable???
|
Tracking basis
is important in managing basis risk and effectively using basis contracts.
Area and/or regional basis estimates
are available from _____________________.
|
EXAMPLE of basis chart in Appendix III.
|
ACTION
POINT
Create your own basis table.
|
Commodity
___________________________
|
|
Location
__________________________
|
|
Nearby Futures Contract |
| Date |
Cash Price |
Futures
Contract Month |
Futures
Contract Price |
Basis |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harvest Delivery |
| Forward
cash contract offer |
Harvest
contract futures price |
Implied
basis |
Basis
contract offer |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
back>> |
|
|
HEDGING WITH OPTIONS
A put option purchase sets a floor on the crop
price throughout the life of the contractAdvantages
- Extends pricing decision window
- May reduce commercial storage costs
- No risk of adverse basis change
- Convenient contract quantities
- Possible advance partial payment
Disadvantages
- Risk of adverse basis change
- Cost may be greater than value of price
protection
- Contracts in fixed quantities only
- Requires significant knowledge and
substantial data
When to Use
- When you need to eliminate downside price
risk but want to maintain ability to capture possible upside price gains
A put option that allows the holder to take a
futures position is purchased for the actual or expected cash position.
- Options can be exercised, sold, or allowed
to expire
- Net price received is a combination of the
cash market and options market transactions
|
|
SCENARIO 1: |
|
Date: January 15
Objective: Evaluate price protection
available through harvest (August)
Current futures/options market situation:
CBOT Sep wheat futures price = $3.35
per bushel
We know:
-
Have ability to purchase “right to
sell” (put option) CBOT Sep futures
-
Have right to sell at several
different strike prices above or below the current market price
-
Premiums vary by strike price;
right to sell increases in price as strike price increases
-
Option on Sep wheat expires Aug 25
|
| |
Strike Price |
Premium (cents/bu) |
|
| |
3.00 |
12.25 |
|
| |
3.10 |
15.25 |
|
| |
3.20 |
21.25 |
|
| |
3.30 |
27.00 |
|
| |
3.40 |
33.50 |
|
|
|
Option premium influenced by:
-
Strike price relative to the
current futures; intrinsic value exists if strike price is above futures
price
-
$3.00 put has 0
cents of intrinsic value
-
$3.40 put has 5
cents of intrinsic value
-
Time until expiration; futures
price can change
-
$3.00 put can have
intrinsic value if futures price goes below $3.00
-
More time to expiration = more
time value
-
More market volatility = more time
value
Closing a put position
-
“Sell” at the current premium;
premium changes over time as futures price changes and expiration approaches
-
Let option expire if worthless;
option expires with no intrinsic value
-
Exercise and obtain futures
position; may be automatic if expires with value
|
|
EXAMPLE 1
Date: January 15
Objective: Expects to harvest 30,000
bushels of wheat in August
-
Evaluate expected price protection
Strike price of Sep put
= 3.30
+ expected local basis
= (.10)
- put cost (premium + fee)
= .28
= Expected price protection =
2.92
-
Decision to buy
a.
Quantity to protect: 67% of
production = 20,000 bushels
b.
Number of contracts: 4 (=
20,000/5,000)
-
Buy put options
a.
Four CBOT 3.30 Sep wheat put
options at $.28 (= $.27 premium + $.01 broker fee)
b.
Expected minimum price = $2.92/bu
with potential to benefit if price increases
|
ACTION
POINT When and how would you use
this on your farm?
back>> |
| |
|
back>> |